April 19, 2017
20 Dev Metrics - 2. Cost of Changing CodeThe second in my Twitter series 20 Dev Metrics is the Cost of Changing Code. This is a brute force metric - anything involving measuring lines of code tends to be - so handle with care. The temptation will be for teams to game this, and it's very easily gamed. As with all metrics, cost of changing code should be used as a diagnostic tool, not as weaponised as a target or as a stick to beat dev teams with.
NB: My advice is to collect these metrics under the radar, and use them to provide hindsight when establishing a link between the way you write code and the results the business gets.
The aim is to establish the trend for cost of change, so we can link it to our first metric, Lead Time to Delivery. There are two things we need to track in order to calculate this simple metric.
1. How much code is changing (lines added, modified and deleted) - often called "code churn". There are tools available for various VCS solutions that can do this for you.
2. How much that change cost (in developer time or wages). Your project admin should have this information available in some form. If there's one thing teams are measuring, it's usually cost.
Divide developer cost by code churn, and - hey presto - you have the cost of changing a line of code.
All teams experience an increase in the cost of changing code, but better teams tend to experience a flatter gradient. The worst teams have a "hockey stick" trend, where change becomes prohibitively expensive alarmingly soon. e.g., one software company, after 8 years, had a cost of change 40x higher than at the start. At the same time, they tend to see lead times growing exponentially, as delivery gets slower and slower.
I dare your boss not to care about these first two metrics!
Posted 2 years, 9 months ago on April 19, 2017